On 2005-07-14 00:22, "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : I couldn't agree more. Helping source-level compatibility, as much as > : this can be accomplished for kernel code, is definitely a plus. This is > : partly the reason why I noted that OpenBSD synchronized their queue.h > : header with NetBSD a few times in the past. I just didn't propose > : something like this because I'm not sure I can convince any of the three > : BSD teams to s/SIMPLEQ/STAILQ/ or vice versa :-) > > Yea, but adding the #defines to sys/queue.h in both directions likely > wouldn't hurt.
Surely. Great idea! As long as there *is* an equivalent macro that exactly matches the expected behavior, this can work nicely. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
