Lately Vasil Dimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > 1) Does the fact that the linker does not realize that the libraries > > have already been found indicate a bug in the linker? If so, how do I > > best report it? > I cannot think of any sensible reason for this behavior, so I guess it > would be good if it can be "fixed" without breaking something else :) > You best report it by creating a patch and using send-pr(1) to submit > it.
I don't think this is breakage: same soname doesn't account for same binary, especially if rpath is used. Rpath explicitly states "i (the elf object) want the libs from this path first", not "for me and descendants, search this path first". At least that's what I expect it to do. cheers simon -- Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\ Work - Mac +++ space for low $$$ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ / Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \ Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
pgpc3NxRRohoM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
