On Sun May 22 05, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > Can you please confirm that you also see the problem when you are using > xterm (not Eterm). Can you also please advise what versions of FreeBSD, > X11 and xterm/Eterm you are using. >
OK. Seems like you somehow knew what was going on here. The problem has now clearly shifted towards the Eterm code. Xterm display the VT100 codes correctly. It seems Eterm supports VT100 codes, but the code is slow and buggy. Thx a lot for your help. This was bugging me for quite some time now. Version is FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Wed Apr 27 03:14:27 CEST 2005 btw. However I'm still thinking of replacing the whole VT100 stuff with a set of syscalls. So...is there a way to reposition the cursor inside the sdtout stream just by using syscalls? Can I use lseek() or some other syscall to change the current FD position? I had a look at the 'burncd' code and the code works brilliantly even under Eterm. However burncd being a C app uses fprintf. Can I replace the functionality of fprintf under x86asm by using only syscalls? Cheers. Thx again for your help. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
