"Macy, Kip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hello Kip,
> In all fairness I'd like to say that Nate put me in touch with someone > to commit the work. At about the same time I discovered a rather > annoying bug (since fixed), and I haven't followed back up. Ok, > For those who would like to try it out I just submitted a sparse tree > patch against the development branch (xeno-unstable.bk), that I > believe will be committed shortly. Great. > It and a kernel can be found at: > http://www.fsmware.com/xenofreebsd/5.3/050317/ > You'll find some very basic instructions for booting a FreeBSD guest > on xen one level up. Ok, I'll give it a shot asap > To avoid premature enthusiasm I'd like to point out that FreeBSD is > currently only supported as an unprivileged guest. DOM0 support is not > that much work, it simply isn't a priority at the moment. Ok, not really annoying, Manuel Bouyer is working on domain0 support for NetBSD, so I won't have to install some linux on the box ;) As my girlfriend would like me to keep the bare minimum number of machines here, Xen is the way to run Net/Free/DFly and maybe some dreadful Debian on a single amd64 machine. Regarding this kind of setup, do you know if Xen could support amd64 in domain0 and mix amd64/ia32 kernels/userlands in other domains ? Regards. Éric Masson -- SP: Aux dernière nouvelles, MOSXS est "due... in the next few weeks". EL: La bonne nouvelle, est que vu la tournure des événements, on va EL: bientôt être sûr que MacOS X Server est bien compatible an 2000 ;-) -+- EL in Guide du Macounet Pervers : Le bug Y30K nous guête -+- _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
