Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I am being a bit unfair here because I am lumping CGD in with the > equally defficient code in Linux (Loop-AES etc). It was mostly the > linux code I talked to people about, but CGD makes the same exact > mistake.
Loop-AES for Linux has improved a lot since v1.X versions. Please take a look at recent v3.X versions which include security features that even your GBDE doesn't have. > It appears to me, that the people who designed CGD and the Linux > Loop-AES and similar focused very hard on the box that said "AES" > without giving much consideration to where the arrows between the > boxes went. Early versions of loop-AES were FUBARed, true. But why do you insist on ranting about fuckups that were fixed long time ago? -- Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
