[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What about porting NetBSD's cgd(4) [1] driver ? It *might* be > easier to port since it does not require GEOM.
Thanks for the suggestion, but IMHO GBDE is superior to CGD, as I have already explained in detail a couple of weeks ago: http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/kernel/2005-02/msg00037.html ALeine ___________________________________________________________________ WebMail FREE http://mail.austrosearch.net _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"