[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

> What about porting NetBSD's cgd(4) [1] driver ?  It *might* be
> easier to port since it does not require GEOM.

Thanks for the suggestion, but IMHO GBDE is superior to CGD, as I have
already explained in detail a couple of weeks ago:

http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/kernel/2005-02/msg00037.html

ALeine

___________________________________________________________________
WebMail FREE http://mail.austrosearch.net 
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to