Actually, I think the answer is YES. You're apparently answering a different question. See below.
It is my understanding that virtually any open-source license is *compatible* with the MIT and 2-clause BSD licenses, since all the MIT/2-clause BSD licenses require is that you acknowledge and preserve the license, copyright, and disclaimer.
However, I believe it is generally not possible to use CDDL code for integral parts of FreeBSD because, like the LGPL, the CDDL requires that modifications be made available under the CDDL. It is probably fine for kernel modules and extensions, but that's something core@ needs to decide.
As the conclusion, which state are available?
Pre Post ---------------------------------- BSD license ----> CDDL GPL license ----> CDDL MIT license ----> CDDL CDDL ----> BSD license CDDL ----> GPL license CDDL ----> MIT license
To say nothing of it, the post herein and hereto is subject to hereinafter.
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer and make no guarantee about theWhat a cool clause above is! It's just simple though. If possible, I'd like to
accuracy of the contents of this message. The opinions herein do
not reflect those of the FreeBSD Project. Use this information at
your own peril. Beware of dog. Slippery when wet.
use it in my this sort of post. It is entered into which type of License, I wonder.
Eitarou
_______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
