On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, M. Warner Losh wrote: [snip]
MWL> rm doesn't have to live in the chroot. Consider MWL> chroot /some/path/to/a/chroot rm -rf / MWL> in this case, everything under the /some/path/to/a/chroot would be MWL> removed. However, the rm that's running is outside of the chroot. Not to be too nit-picking, but this is not true, as far as I can understand chroot(8) and chroot(2) ;-) However, since rm is usually statically linked and/or all needed code segments are referenced during rm work are loaded/referenced, this operation finishes successfully (just checked on 4-STABLE and -CURRENT). ... and no, I do *NOT* want to participate in this bikesched color discussion! ;-P Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
