On 2004-10-02 10:51, Tillman Hodgson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 10:42:16AM -0500, Sean Farley wrote: > > Why not default on? root will not run 'rm -rf /' on purpose very often. > > Once will be enough. :) Also, when and why would someone want to do > > this? > > Exactly. Who would expect `rm -rf /` to actually succeed? It's not only > dangerous, it doesn't work in a useful way ;-) > > If one is thinking about `rm -rf /`, `newfs` is probably the right > answer.
And a hell of a lot faster too. This is the *only* reason why I initially wrote this. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
