On 18 Sep, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Here i report a patch different from Giorgos' one. The approch is completely > different: working on syscall_register() function in kern/kern_syscalls.c > file. > > ============================== > >> cat kern_syscalls.diff > --- kern_syscalls.c Sat Sep 18 14:37:53 2004 > +++ kern_syscalls2.c Sat Sep 18 14:37:53 2004 > @@ -73,6 +73,11 @@ > sysent[*offset].sy_call != (sy_call_t *)lkmressys) > return EEXIST; > > +#if (__i386__) && (INVARIANTS) > + KASSERT(new_sysent->nargs >= 0 && new_sysent->nargs <= i386_SYS_ARGS, > + "invalid number of syscalls"); > +#endif > + > *old_sysent = sysent[*offset]; > sysent[*offset] = *new_sysent; > return 0;
Why panic the machine at this point? Just refuse to install the syscall and return an error. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
