these are results from running Coverity's analysis over Freebsd 4.10 kernel.
two improper loops:
if_ef.c:566 and atapi-all.c
ng_socket.c: possible double free of resp 815 and 870, depending on caller context. is this possible?
I'm not seeing it..
Can you show the lines in the version that is being examined?
(So I can be sure I'm looking at the right code)
(and how do I interpret the above report? 815 and 870 are freeing different things.)
if_bfe.c: double call to bfe_release_resources will free lots of stuff twice on failure.
aha_isa.c: aha_isa_attach: aha_free free "aha", can't use it afterwards, lots of examples.
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
