On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 06:47:49PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 08:38:57AM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > > Hello Sergey. I haven't looked at your code, but I'll provide > > some comments, having implemented a mmaped ringbuffer BPF > > replacement myself. > > We've had some prior interest in this. Do you have patches? If so, I'd be > more than happy to look at them. > > Linux has something similar, but when I looked at the mechanism involved, > I was loathe to adopt the same logic because the buffer(s) involved were > allocated from userland and then mapped accordingly; we generally can't > afford to take a page fault in that path, for mutex related reasons.
If I finally get to finish fixing wiring, you should simply be able to call vslock(9) in your kernel module and get that functionality. As it is, vslock(9) is broken.... -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
