On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 05:34:05PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Wednesday 07 January 2004 17:08, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > I don't think it IS a dumb device, there is a USB spec called DFU which > > > covers it and the hosts job is to do the reenumeration. > > > > Sparing a transistor to offload the work to the host were its also > > way more complex to do is dump. > > If this is part of the Spec, then the spec is dump too. > > Err yes, this IS USB we're talking about here :)
Reead your spec - it's not part of USB itself. umass, ulpt, etc are extensions. It is even that a mass storage device doesn't have to honour umass specification to get the USB compliance logo :( > > usbd_reset_port should do from the USB point of view, but this doesn't > > trigger Free BSD to do a reconfiguration of the device, which is > > required after reset. > > > > Maybe the following will do instead: > > usbd_clear_port_feature(dev, port, UHF_PORT_ENABLE) > > delay(USB_PORT_POWERUP_DELAY); > > usbd_set_port_feature(dev, port, UHF_PORT_ENABLE) > > dev and port is that from the hub. > > Except that would remove power to the port I think.. AFAIK power is independend, but I'm not 100% shure. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
