Should device ehci be a default in GENERIC, then? -James
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:47:35AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I recently got a usb 2.0 hard drive to which I painfully wait for 1MB/s > > transfers. According to dmesg fbsd is only doing 1.0: > > usb0: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-A> on uhci0 > > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > > usb1: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-B> on uhci1 > > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > > usb2: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-C> on uhci2 > > usb2: USB revision 1.0 > > > > (Yes i double checked my laptop does indeed have usb 2.0) > > > > I saw that ehci had usb 2.0 support comitted. Is this coming for uhci? I > > suppose it's too late to get this into 5.2 -RELEASE. > > uhci is strictly an usb1.x controller. > Build a kernel with ehci support if you have a high speed capable > controller. > > -- > B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"