"Steven Hartland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Also it seems that linprocfs relies on procfs being mounted > however I cant find any docs that mention this and see no > reason why it should be the case. The problem I see > is that I get errors from linux apps about /proc/<pid>/file > not existing. When trussing them they are never trying to > open "file" I suspect it is happening when the access either > cmdline or exe most likely exe.
linprocfs uses parts of the procfs code; for instance, linprocfs's <pid>/exe and procfs's <pid>/file are backed by the same code. In the case of <pid>/cmdline, which exists with the same name in both FreeBSD and Linux, linprocfs relies on procfs's cmdline to "show through" rather than duplicate it. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
