On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:48:22PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 08-Aug-2003 Bernd Walter wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:27:30PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > >> Well, that would be a major pain on current since nexus is already > >> finished attaching many of its drivers by the time it gets to here. > >> Also, if you use ACPI and if ACPI exists, then this function _won't_ > >> _ever_ _be_ _called_. If you use a hostb PCI driver, then it will > >> work both for ACPI and legacy. > > > > I agree with this point and if I understood correct this is what > > John Birrel already had done. > > No, he is still working in the nexus/pcib driver's identify routine, > not in a separate 'hostb' PCI driver. > > > However - I would still like to know why > > device_add_child(nexus, "elanbb", -1); > > results in an elanbb instance numer 1 connected to pci0. > > And why I don't get any iicbb childs. > > I would have to see your code changes in order to try to tell you that.
http://www.cosmo-project.de/~bernd/elanbb.diff -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
