On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 05:51:27PM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote: > In a message written on Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:48:23PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > Another approach would be to add a new option to SSH > > so that it could encrypt only the initial authentication, > > then pass data unencrypted after that. This would > > go a long way to addressing the performance concerns. > > ssh -c none? > > Note, you don't want to use password authentication in this case, but > public key should still be ok.
I have patches for this, they may be a little out-of-date: http://www.incunabulum.com/code/patches/openssh/ http://www.incunabulum.com/code/patches/openssl/ BMS _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
