Was this ever committed? -Guido
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 01:53:26PM +0100, Nick Hibma wrote: > > Woohoo! Congrats. Nice job. If other people could test this, this should > be committed. I'll have to have a quick look at the initialisation code > that has been added to see whether there is no problem with that, but > from the quick glance I just had, I don't think there is a prolbem in > there. > > Nick > > > > > Bingo! :) > > > > When I changed the bsqh initialisation, I get speed above 400 KB/s, > > that makes me feel much better :) > > > > I am sending a corrected patch as attachment. > > > > Tomas > > > > On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Ian Dowse wrote: > > > > > I had a quick look at the patch - one thing I noticed is that you > > > are possibly not initialising all of the bsqh fields. In -current, > > > bsqh->hlink and bsqh->qh.qh_hlink are set up to point at the `lsqh' > > > QH. It might not be the problem though. > > > > > > Ian > > > > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.van-laarhoven.org/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.etla.net/~n_hibma/ > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message -- Guido van Rooij | Phone: ++31 653 994 773 Madison Gurkha, Technology Think-Tank | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | FreeBSD committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
