Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
If people think that -q is a good option for printenv, I can come up with a patch for the standard printenv. Opinions?
Some form of unambiguous output from printenv would be nice. I would suggest quoting both the variable name and the value just to be on the safe side. Even better: modify 'env' to support that format as input. Then you could use, e.g., printenv -q >saved_environment to record the environment and then use env - -r saved_environment <command> to recreate that environment. Tim Kientzle To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
