Bill,
Any hint as to what seems to be going on here and maybe a clue
to a possible solution?
Regards,
Abe
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:02:07PM -0700, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:10:52PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> > Not to be emphatic, or anything, but IPFW has to be static. There
> > is voodoo you can use to make it know about loaded modules, but I'll
> > be damned if I know what it is (again, I refer you to the handbook).
> > 8-).
>
> nope. ipfw doesn't have to be static. ipfw+ipdivert has to be static.
> up until a while ago, ipfw+dummynet and ipfw+bridge had to be static,
> but that was fixed and MFC'd. ipfw by itself (which includes the dynamic
> rules) can be static or kldload'd.
>
> --
> - bill fumerola / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
