Interesting...  The /usr/local behavior is new then on Solaris (or was
configured in), because I know that it didn't used to be that way.
I'm pretty sure that the solaris native compilers don't do that.  The
bsdi compiler also used to not have /usr/local included
automatically.  The fact that it is included BEFORE /usr/include seems
wrong to me and that it would break things if somebody ever installed
a file with the same name system header in /usr/local....

Warner

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to