On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > Richard Sharpe wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > > > Samba uses a seperate process for each connection, and Windows opens > > > one connection per share. > > > > Yes to the first claim, no to the second. Most definitely not. For a > > single client, windows puts all share access (net use, mounting, whatever > > you want to call it) over the single TCP connection to the server. > > You're right, sorry. I had gotten mixed up on the multiple connection > issue because of my own configuration that results in one share per > connection. > > > Nope, ~700 connections! > > Even with just one connection per machine, though, you're still going > to have a significant amount of swappable memory in idle smbd > processes.
Yes, I agree. Something that I would like to do more about by making sure that as much as possible is shared. Regards ----- Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
