On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Doug Barton wrote:
> D J Hawkey Jr wrote: > > > I'm guessing that the suggestion to turn it off (the original thread) is > > valid enough, as all machines referred to were on the same network, else > > why wouldn't the above still hold true? Or is it a matter of FTP and/or > > SMTP (specifically, sendmail) not playing nice with newreno? > > The problem is that Terry has described the theory, whereas many of us > who have observed the situation in the real world have noticed that even > on a homogenous network (all with newreno enabled) performance is still > worse than with newreno disabled. > > I don't have enough network stack fu to debug or improve this, but I > have enough experience with it to know that off is better. For you, I'd > say turning it off is the first thing you should test, and see what > happens. > > Doug I've been meaning to investigate, but I keep getting sidetracked... But yeah, I agree with you. Going back to plain reno isn't the end of the world; it's still behaves decently and won't cause problems. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message