I don't understand the resetpriority() function in the file
kern_synch.c in -current.  I'm wondering if someone can help
me?  What I don't understand is the logic for the call(s) to
maybe_resched() in resetpriority().  resetpriority() adjusts
kg->kg_user_pri, but doesn't touch td->td_priority.  Therefore
the call(s) to maybe_resched() seems to be a no-op?

Now, if the callers of resetpriority() are fiddling with 
td->td_priority before calling resetpriority(), then I could 
maybe understand this.  But, in every case I can see, the caller
of resetpriority() either does not change td->td_priority at all,
or it adjusts if _after_ the call to resetpriority().  Therefore,
it seems to me that maybe the call to maybe_resched not only is
a no-op, but perhaps the call should be made later, where needed,
by the callers to resetpriority()?

Thanks for any help.


>From kern_synch.c:

void
resetpriority(kg)
        register struct ksegrp *kg;
{
        register unsigned int newpriority;
        struct thread *td;

        mtx_lock_spin(&sched_lock);
        if (kg->kg_pri_class == PRI_TIMESHARE) {
                newpriority = PUSER + kg->kg_estcpu / INVERSE_ESTCPU_WEIGHT +
                    NICE_WEIGHT * (kg->kg_nice - PRIO_MIN);
                newpriority = min(max(newpriority, PRI_MIN_TIMESHARE),
                    PRI_MAX_TIMESHARE);
                kg->kg_user_pri = newpriority;
        }
        FOREACH_THREAD_IN_GROUP(kg, td) {         <------ I don't understand
                maybe_resched(td);                <------ these 
        }
        mtx_unlock_spin(&sched_lock);
}

and earlier:

void
maybe_resched(struct thread *td)
{

        mtx_assert(&sched_lock, MA_OWNED);
        if (td->td_priority < curthread->td_priority)
                curthread->td_kse->ke_flags |= KEF_NEEDRESCHED;
}




-- 
Richard Seaman, Jr.        email:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5182 N. Maple Lane         phone:    262-367-5450
Nashotah WI 53058            fax:    262-367-5852

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to