The FEC works for me doing the following on 4.5-STABLE: # cd /usr/src/sys # tar -zxvf <path-to-download>/fec.tar.gz # cd modules/netgrah/fec && make install
# kldload ng_fec.ko # ngctl mkpeer fec dummy fec # ngctl msg fec0: add_iface '"fxp0"' # ngctl msg fec0: add_iface '"fxp1"' # ngctl msg fec0: set_mode_inet then it usually needs a "ifconfig fec0 up" to start moving packets. Uplink is to a Cisco 3534 with the two ports setup with "port group 1 distribution source", using "distribution destination" gives me countless duplicates obviously because the same mac-address is on both interfaces. I also added the mac-address to forward to both interfaces using "mac-address-table static" With this setup the max throughput from one remote machine is the capacity of one interface, but that is enaugh for me. /Oli Þann 27. April 2002, ritaði Baldur Gislason eitthvað á þessa leið: > I have tried that fec driver, no luck. I get the interface up, but when I try > to transmit packets over it I get "invalid argument" or something like that, > I had the network cards hooked to a Cisco catalyst and I had grouped the > ports, and I've tried two types of network cards, 3com 905C and Intel > EtherExpress 100 > > Baldur Gislason > > On Saturday 27 April 2002 06:07, you wrote: > > Gary Stanley wrote: > > > Is it possible to split the load of IP traffic with 2 ethernet cards on a > > > 4.x machine? I'm new to "load balancing" in a sense, however, I'd like to > > > try something that seems more "robust" > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~wpaul/FEC/4.x/ > > > > -- Terry > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message -- Ólafur Osvaldsson Kerfisstjóri Internet á Íslandi hf. Sími: 525-5291 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
