Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > The file is already the required size.
> 
> Gah... oops :)
> 
> Have you tried the mapping with PROT_READ as well?  I don't think
> most arches allow for access without PROT_READ along with PROT_WRITE.

Being the required size doesn't necessarily mean that it
had indirect blocks allocated to the NUL filled region.

He'd be much better off trying this with a file he created
using "dd if=/dev/zero bsize=??? count=??? of=my_file" than
something truncated to the expected size.

Actually, he's be better still if he'd implement a "recvfile"
to be the opposite end of a "sendfile".  8-).

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to