On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 08:09:06AM -0600, GB Clark wrote: > On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 14:27:59 +0200 > Dimitar Peikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 04:01:58 -0800 (PST) > > Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > he said -stable.. > > > > > > what are the malloc options on -stable? > > > > > > maybe we should make sure that they are null > > > > > > ln -s ">" /etc/malloc.conf > > > (I hope that helps) :) > > > > > > > I've tested it with : > > > > cc -O6 -o malloc_test malloc_test.c > > That -O6 does not look right from here. Do we support anything over -O2?
ISTR that -On is exactly the same for -O2 for n > 2; or is this stale info? Maybe GCC 3.x supports higher optimization levels; still, I don't think this would make any significant difference. Note to Dimitar: maybe compiling it with -static would make it just a little bit faster; then again, it may not. > > And how about some source for malloc_test.c? The fact of running something at -O6 > started some bells ringing. The source was attached to Dimitar's original post :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 I am jealous of the first word in this sentence.
msg32576/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
