Scott Mitchell wrote: > However, this got me thinking -- is the right solution here to have a PAM > module that does the setusercontext(), so programs that already know about > PAM will just work, without needing to know about setusercontext() as well? > I can see that causing problems with programs (login, xdm, etc.) that > already understand both mechanisms, but they could always not use this > hypothetical pam_setusercontext module, right? > > So, is this a worthwhile thing to have? I'm happy to either write the PAM > module or fix kdm, but I'd rather not waste my time learning about PAM > internals if people think this would be a pointless exercise.
No. THis is a bad idea. Fix KDM instead. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
