On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 02:07:22PM +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Wilko Bulte wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:15:56AM +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote: > > > It seems Matthew Gilbert wrote: > > > > > So, general question to everyone having crashes during heavy > > > > > IDE workloads: Please post your /var/run/dmesg.boot > > > > > output. > > > > > > > atapci0: <VIA 82C686 ATA100 controller> port 0xd000-0xd00f at device 7.1 on > > > > > > You have the VIA 82c686b southbridge chip which is known to cause severe > > > > Hi Soren, > > > > isn't it possible to identify the southbridge as a B variant directly? > > > > What I mean is, I have an older (non-B) > > > > isab0: <VIA 82C686 PCI-ISA bridge> at device 4.0 on pci0 > > atapci0: <VIA 82C686 ATA66 controller> port 0xd800-0xd80f at device 4.1 on > > pci0 > > pci0 > > > > and the strings that is displayed is almost the same (ATA100 versus > > ATA66). > > > > Identifying it a bit more clearly might save a bunch of questions on > > the lists. > > Well I think the ATA66 versus ATA100 is plenty different to tell > which version we've dealing with here, and there's already new > chipsets from VIA that uses the same ID's but with different
Lovely idea.. not. > chip names, so the chip number is more or less without meaning > anyways.... Bah.. so much for my theory then :-( tnx Wilko -- | / o / /_ _ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, The Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
