On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Matthew Dillon wrote: > This is connecting to inetd running a dd if=/dev/zero bs=32k on a > machine with the rfc sysctl's turned on and 262144 byte send and > receive buffers, without jumbo frames (my gigE switch doesn't support > them :-( ). nice, 950 Mbs which should be the theoretical maximum. what kind of CPUs do you have in there, and do you know how hard they were working? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Richard Sharpe
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) David Greenman
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Justin T. Gibbs
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Andrew R. Reiter
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Bosko Milekic
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Lamont Granquist
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Andrew R. Reiter
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Lamont Granquist
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Danny Braniss
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Matthew Dillon
- Samba performance compared between FreeBSD and L... Richard Sharpe
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Luigi Rizzo
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Mike Silbersack
- Re: FreeBSD performing worse than Linux? Josef Karthauser
- Re: FreeBSD performing worse than Linux? Matthew Dillon
- Re: FreeBSD performing worse than Linux? Josef Karthauser