In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Polstra writes: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Netgraph is a prototyping tool, which has enough performance to be >> useful in non-performance-critical applications. (such as all sync >> interfaces). It is not designed for gigabit interfaces etc. > >You are selling Netgraph way too short. I've been using it >intensively with gigabit interfaces, and it performs very, very well. >For my application (which involves generating and responding to a >whole bunch of network traffic) it has yielded a good 4-5 times better >performance than any other alternative I've found.
I have to agree here. Netgraph has some shortcomings, but performance is not one of them. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
