:In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Dillon writes: :> :> Hmm. Do we have a guard page at the base of the per process kernel :> stack? : :As I understand it, no. In RELENG_4 there are UPAGES (== 2 on i386) :pages of per-process kernel state at p->p_addr. The stack grows :down from the top, and struct user (sys/user.h) sits at the bottom. :According to the comment in the definition of struct user, only :the first three items in struct user are valid in normal running :conditions: Ok. I'm going to add a magic number to the end of the process structure and check it in mi_switch() in -stable. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Matt Dillon
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Julian Elischer
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Ian Dowse
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Matt Dillon
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any idea... Julian Elischer
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Ian Dowse
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Matt Dillon
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any idea... Julian Elischer
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any idea... Bernd Walter
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Peter Wemm
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Matt Dillon
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Mike Silbersack
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Peter Wemm
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Peter Wemm
- Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? Bernd Walter