Thus spake Robert Withrow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I know it is slimy, but couldn't there be a dummy "port" just > called "XFree86" that is what most other ports depend on? The minority > of ports that actually care what version of X is installed could always > use the version-specific names... Would be nice if we had a package system that lets you just install - let me call them - "features", such as a "XFree86" feature, other ports could depend on. Multiple packages could supply this feature then and ports could also say if they depend on a specific version. Alex, hiding in a dark corner. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 glenn gombert
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 David O'Brien
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Jordan Hubbard
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Jordan Hubbard
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 John Baldwin
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Robert Withrow
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Alexander Langer
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Rasputin
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Alexander Langer
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Alexander Langer
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 glenn gombert
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Brian Dean
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Jordan Hubbard
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 David O'Brien
- Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Jordan Hubbard