In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nate Williams writes:

>> TRW supported a lot of the early
>> 386BSD/FreeBSD effort, back before Walnut Creek CDROM threw
>> in and had us change the version number from 0.1 to 1.0 to
>> make it a bit easier to sell.
>
>*Huh*  That's revisionist history if I've ever heard it.  We did a 1.0
>release for FreeBSD because we wanted to differentiate ourselves from
>386BSD (lot of bad blood there with the Jolitz's) and NetBSD (which had
>a 0.8 release at that time).

Nate,

You're replying to Terry for christs sake!  What did you expect if not
revisionist $anything ?

Which reminds me, Adrian still oves us his story about ref :-)


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to