On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 11:21:09PM +0100, Steve Roome wrote: > ping http://www.myserver.wherever/ > instead of telnet wherever 80, just to see if I get a connected or > not ? Do you have *ANY* clue how ping works? Ping uses ICMP packets; not TCP, not UDP -- thus there is NO concept of ports. And what does "instead of telnet mean"?? Again, do you have any clue how ping works? To the person that wants to "traceroute http://www.myserver.wherever/", do you have *ANY* clue how traceroute works? You cannnot use a port that something is answering on. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Richard Hodges
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Paul Richards
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Michael Sinz
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Paul Chvostek
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Joseph Mallett
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Chris Costello
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Chris Costello
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Leo Bicknell
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Chris Costello
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Leo Bicknell
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. David O'Brien
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Steve Roome
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. David O'Brien
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Richard Hodges
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Hroi Sigurdsson
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Bruce A. Mah
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Leo Bicknell
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Matthew D. Fuller
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Richard Hodges
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Michael Sinz
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Sansonetti Laurent