On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 11:36:45AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > Because this code is broken and obfuscated? :) You're submitting patches to the GCC maintainer to make it produce better code, right? :-) :-) :-) :-) -- Leo Bicknell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Engineer - Internetworking Engineer - CCIE 3440 Read TMBG List - [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.tmbg.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- function calls/rets in assembly Steve Roome
- RE: function calls/rets in assembly John Baldwin
- Re: function calls/rets in assembly David O'Brien
- Re: function calls/rets in assembly John Baldwin
- Re: function calls/rets in assembly Leo Bicknell
- Re: function calls/rets in assembly John Baldwin
- Re: function calls/rets in assembly Leo Bicknell
- Re: function calls/rets in assembly Dan Nelson
- Re: function calls/rets in assembly Matt Dillon
- Re: function calls/rets in assembly John Baldwin
- Re: function calls/rets in assembly Valentin Nechayev
- Re: function calls/rets in assembly Peter Pentchev
- Re: function calls/rets in assembly David O'Brien
- Re: function calls/rets in assembly Valentin Nechayev
- Re: function calls/rets in assembly David O'Brien