On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, Matt Dillon wrote: > : Uh, I don't think you understand what this limit is about. It's > :essentially the limit on the amount of filesystem directory data that > :can be cached. It does not limit the amount of file data that can > :be cached - that is only limited by the amount of RAM in the machine. > Yes, and the buffer cache determines how much dirty file-backed data > (via write() or mmap()) the system is allowed to accumulate before > it forces it out, which should probably be the greater concern here. How hard would it be to allow dirty data in the file cache, without buffer mappings ? regards, Rik -- IA64: a worthy successor to i860. http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Send all your spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (spam digging piggy) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Recommendation for minor KVM adjustments for the relea... Leo Bicknell
- Re: Recommendation for minor KVM adjustments for the relea... Peter Wemm
- Re: Recommendation for minor KVM adjustments for the relea... Leo Bicknell
- Re: Recommendation for minor KVM adjustments for the relea... Rik van Riel
- Re: Recommendation for minor KVM adjustments for the relea... David Greenman
- Re: Recommendation for minor KVM adjustments for the ... Nate Williams
- Re: Recommendation for minor KVM adjustments for the relea... Matt Dillon
- Re: Recommendation for minor KVM adjustments for the relea... Matt Dillon
- Re: Recommendation for minor KVM adjustments for the relea... Rik van Riel
- Re: Recommendation for minor KVM adjustments for the relea... Terry Lambert
- Re: Recommendation for minor KVM adjustments for the relea... Julian Elischer
- Re: Recommendation for minor KVM adjustments for the ... Terry Lambert