Both boxes are -current :)
Thanks
Andrew
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 10:01:25PM +0200, lists wrote:
> > Hi, hoping someone can help me out with something here, because Ive got a
> > very strange problem.
> >
> > On my one pc, when assigning an IRQ to my PCIC device, it assigns an IRQ
> > and continues, works 100% now that I changed device.hints to look for pcic
> > on pci instead of isa, card works everything.
> >
> > However, on my other pc with an identical setup, when trying to assign
> > pcic irq it does this: (from dmesg):
> >
> > pci_cfgintr_search: linked (3) to configured irq 10 at 0:9:0
> > pci_cfgintr: 0:10 INTA routed to irq 10
> >
> > Now for some reason I have it in my head that that irq routing is broken,
> > because its the only difference I can find between the non-working box and
> > the working box. Is there any way that I can force that card to not use a
> > routed interrupt like that. Ive already tried fiddling in my bios with
> > the IRQ settings to reserve things etc, no luck there either. I know for
> > a fact that irq 5/7/9/10/11 are all available on my box, with nothing
> > taking them.
> >
> > Any ideas would be MUCH appreciated
>
> The second box wouldn't be a -stable machine, would it now?
> I think PCIC IRQ routing was absolutely not working in -stable as of
> a few weeks ago, when Warner Losh started MFC'ing the PCIC bits.
> That MFC might not be complete yet.
>
> If both boxes are running -current, I'll just shut up :)
>
> G'luck,
> Peter
>
> --
> This would easier understand fewer had omitted.
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
