Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > Hmm, maybe we should implement the notion of "critical_local" and
> > "critical_net" filesystems (a la NetBSD). Heck, I don't even need the
> > distinction between net and local, just critical would do. All remote,
> > critical filesystems would be blocking, and all others not.
> >
> > Sometimes the stick of POLA should be broken.
> 
> Not if it adds work.

I think the non-critical ones are the ones with the "-R1"
option set...

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to