Matthew Jacob wrote: > > Hmm, maybe we should implement the notion of "critical_local" and > > "critical_net" filesystems (a la NetBSD). Heck, I don't even need the > > distinction between net and local, just critical would do. All remote, > > critical filesystems would be blocking, and all others not. > > > > Sometimes the stick of POLA should be broken. > > Not if it adds work. I think the non-critical ones are the ones with the "-R1" option set... -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Default retry behaviour for mount_nfs Ian Dowse
- Re: Default retry behaviour for mount_nfs Matthew Jacob
- Re: Default retry behaviour for mount_nfs Matthew Jacob
- Re: Default retry behaviour for mount_nfs Gordon Tetlow
- Re: Default retry behaviour for mount_nfs Matthew Jacob
- Re: Default retry behaviour for mount_nfs Gordon Tetlow
- Re: Default retry behaviour for mount_nfs Matthew Jacob
- Re: Default retry behaviour for mount_nfs Terry Lambert
- Re: Default retry behaviour for mount_nfs Matthew Jacob
- Re: Default retry behaviour for mount_nfs Terry Lambert
- Re: Default retry behaviour for mount_nfs Ian Dowse
- Re: Default retry behaviour for mount_nfs Terry Lambert
- Re: Default retry behaviour for mount_nfs Matt Dillon