Terry Lambert wrote:

> Historically, you've always held that the CDROM must boot
> to sysinstall.  As the software's daddy, I can see why
> you'd want that; but your baby is ugly.
> 
> I don't see anyone stepping up to replace it any time
> soon, so long as you insist that they not be able to
> make money from it, and they can't use the trademark
> if the don't include that blecherous software as the
> default thing to which CDROMs boot.  Yetch.

2 practical questions:
What *exactly* do you see wrong with sysinstall and what
*exactly* would you do to improve it.

I've been looking for various projects to work on, but
sysinstall has never looked (to me) like it needed any
serious work. Perhaps I'm looking at it wrong.

-Bill

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to