On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 04:31:41PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > I guess it's fair to shove Linux deep into swap (as pro-FreeBSD > benchmarkers always do), but not fair to make FreeBSD handle a > large directory? Well... no. This test did stress FreeBSD's ability to handle large directories, and that's fine. Especially since they didn't even bother to compare it to ReiserFS, which should be much better. However, they could have / should have leveled the playing field with one very simple tweak: *Mount all filesystems async* The tests merely tested the effect of the disk's ability to handle tagged queuing and the disk's ability to cache stuff. - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Article: Network performance by OS Matt Dillon
- Re: Article: Network performance by OS Sergey Babkin
- Re: Article: Network performance by OS Matt Dillon
- Re: Article: Network performance by OS Greg Black
- Re: Article: Network performance by OS Sergey Babkin
- Re: Article: Network performance b... Matt Dillon
- Re: Article: Network performan... Sergey Babkin
- Re: Article: Network performance by OS Mike Meyer
- Re: Article: Network performance by OS Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Article: Network performance by OS Andrew Reilly
- Re: Article: Network performance by OS Alex Zepeda
- Re: Article: Network performance by OS Jordan Hubbard
- Re: Article: Network performance by OS Brian Mitchell
- Re: Article: Network performance by OS Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Article: Network performance by OS Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: Article: Network performance by OS E.B. Dreger