On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 08:04:42AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > I also had an idea to break out the network init into several different > pieces falling under 2 headings LINK (ether, atm) and NETWORK (ipx, ipv4, > ipv6, atalk). I've started work on breaking everything out and was > wondering if I should continue with it or if it just too much of a change. Yes it is too much of a change. Let me restate again that the idea right now is to just *minimally* port the NetBSD RC scripts. Once we have a system booting with RCng, we can see where it blows and discuss changes. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Kevin Way
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Doug Barton
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Kevin Way
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Warner Losh
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Gordon Tetlow
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Andrew Hesford
- Boot Order (was Re: import NetBSD rc system) Gordon Tetlow
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Gordon Tetlow
- Re: import NetBSD rc system freebsd-hackers
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Gordon Tetlow
- Re: import NetBSD rc system David O'Brien
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Cyrille Lefevre
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Doug Barton
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Matt Dillon
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Doug Barton
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Matt Dillon
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Greg Black
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Doug Barton
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Eivind Eklund
- Re: import NetBSD rc system David Terrell
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Wes Peters