On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 06:24:58PM +0200, Gyori Sandor wrote:
> 1. I don't understand exactly why, but even into -CURRENT there was
> implemented only the statical part of nsswitch. 

Please search the archives for  full information.  Here is the history
in summary:

  = I ported NetBSD's nsswitch  implementation to FreeBSD-CURRENT.  It
    only  implements files,  NIS,  and Hesiod.   It  does not  support
    dynamically loaded sources.

  = I  extended  the  implementation  to  support  dynamically  loaded
    sources, and ported nss_ldap to use the invented interface.  These
    are the patches you referred to.   This was a prototype to help me
    understand the issues.   They will never be  committed, and should
    not be used in production.

  = I  re-did  the implementation  using  a  design  that I  am  happy
    with, and  interfaces which are agreed-upon-in-principal  with the
    NetBSD nsswitch author.   In addition to new  interfaces, this new
    implementation is reentrant (although YP and our resolver is not).
    A major design goal was to enable the creation of modules that are
    stubs  which talk  to a  long-running  daemon that  does the  hard
    work.  PADL.COM's  nss_ldap is (IMHO) completely  unsuitable for a
    production environment, particularly if you use SSL.

  = Eventually I will finish  the implementation just described.  Left
    to do  is updating some resolver-oriented  stuff like getaddrinfo,
    and (importantly) creating an nsswitch-ldap daemon.

If someone wants  to work on this  stuff, I would be happy  to hand it
off after  we had sufficient  discussion so  that I was  confident the
design was understood.  Otherwise, please wait.  I wish I had finished
it sooner, but that's how it goes.

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques Vidrine / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to