> Since some strings are non-constant (the are allocated) - I believe > the `const' qualifier in the structure declaration is incorrect. 'const' just means "I will not be modifying this"; it's a way for a function prototype to constrain the function's implementation. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: free() and const warnings Thomas David Rivers
- Re: free() and const warnings Peter Pentchev
- Re: free() and const warnings Thomas David Rivers
- Re: free() and const warnings Peter Pentchev
- Re: free() and const warnings Thomas David Rivers
- Re: free() and const warnings T. William Wells
- Re: free() and const warnings Assar Westerlund
- Re: free() and const warnings Peter Pentchev
- Re: free() and const warnings Assar Westerlund
- Re: free() and const warnings Peter Pentchev
- Re: free() and const warnings Mike Smith
- Re: free() and const warnings Thomas David Rivers
- Re: free() and const warnings Matt Dillon
- Re: free() and const warnings Matt Dillon
- Re: free() and const warnings Matt Dillon