If i understand ptrace(2) manual page correctly,
you should use
ptrace(PT_DETACH,pid,(caddr_t)1,0)
instead of
ptrace(PT_DETACH,pid,0,0) .
BTW you code is *very hard to debug* on my 4.1.1 :)
What your uname -a tells you?
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Jiangyi Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I didn't point out that my purpose is just to stop the debugging and leave the
>subprocess alone. It's supposed after PT_DETACH, the subprocess should continue, but
>it didn't. That's what I felt weird. Any clue?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "diman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jiangyi Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 8:54 PM
> Subject: Re: Weird PT_DETACH
>
>
> >
> >
> > To attach debugger to a process please use PT_ATTACH
> > request instead of PT_DETACH. Use PT_DETACH to stop
> > debugging a process and leave it alone.
> >
>
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
