Jason Andresen wrote:
>
> Jason Andresen wrote:
>
> Oops, I fubbed up the linux at 60000 files test, I'm rerunning it now,
> but it will take a while to finish.
>
> > Results:
> > ufs+softupdates is a little slower than ext2fs+wc for low numbers of
> > files, but scales better. I wish I had a Reiserfs partition to
> > test with.
The test is done:
Linux 2.2.16 with ext2fs and write caching
10000 transactions, 60000 simultanious files:
Time:
2084 seconds total
702 seconds of transactions (14 per second)
Files:
65065 created (31 per second)
Creation alone: 60000 files (48 per second)
Mixed with transactions: 5065 files (7 per second)
5078 read (7 per second)
4921 appended (7 per second)
65065 deleted (31 per second)
Deletion alone: 60130 files (395 per second)
Mixed with transactions: 4935 files (7 per second)
Data:
26.01 megabytes read (12.48 kilobytes per second)
325.12 megabytes written (156.01 kilobytes per second)
I don't suppose anybody has a FreeBSD and Linux box dual booting
(or identically speced) with ReiserFS anywhere? I'm quite
curious how much faster ReiserFS is in these tests.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
