I am wondering if theres antything in -stable that supports this card.
from what I can find it uses the ini9100 chipset, and I cant find anything
on the HW compat list about it. any help or insight would be appreciated
John Hildreth
MMPS Engineer
Allegiance Telecom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: 469-259-2612
Cell: 214-914-3112
It has been said:
> Evan S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > if ((kinfo = malloc(nentries * sizeof(*kinfo))) == NULL)
> > err(1, NULL);
> > for (i = nentries; --i >= 0; ++proc_list) {
> > (&kinfo[i])->ki_p = proc_list;
> > if (KI_PROC(&kinfo[i])->p_prison)
> > {
> > printf("Jailed Process\n");
> > printf("%s\n",
> >
> > KI_PROC(&kinfo[i])->p_prison->pr_host);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > KI_PROC is just a macro that is
> > #define KI_PROC(ki) (&(ki)->ki_p->kp_proc)
> >
> > [teqnix](~/work/c/getprocs)%gcc -g -lkvm getprocs.c -o getprocs
> > getprocs.c: In function `main':
> > getprocs.c:87: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
>
> pr_host is a member of struct prison, which is a kernel structure.
> It's under #ifdef _KERNEL, which is why you don't have a definition
> for it. I'm not quite sure where you're getting your process list
> from, but I think that p_prison is a kernel pointer in your context.
> Obviously, trying to follow that from the userland won't do what you
> want. :-)
>
> Then again, I could be wrong. If you want, take the definition of
> struct prison from /usr/include/sys/jail.h and paste it into your
> code. That will get rid of the warning. If your program seg faults
> when you try to run it, you'll know I was right.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dima Dorfman
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
