Gunnar Olsson wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I have configured a logical ethernet interface, so called a tap interface
> (tap0).
> I have also managed to bridged that interface to my "real" ethernet
> interface (rl0)
> and it works fine. Now to my question.
>
> Is it possible to "tunnel" my tap interface including the ip and ethernet
> header into
> a new ip and ethernet header, see figure below.
>
> ---------------------------------|-------------|---------------|-----------|
> ------------|
> | data | ip(tap0) | eth(tap0) | ip(rl0) | eth(rl0)
> |
> ---------------------------------|-------------|---------------|-----------|
> ------------|
>
> It is almost as a tun interface, but I would like to keep the layer 2(ARP
> handling)
> with the logical interface, that's why I want to use the tap interface and
> not the
> tun interface.
>
> Any idea have to make this to work appreciates a lot!
check out the netgraph examples.. you can create a simple tunnel of this type
using the ksocket node and the iface node (amongst others possibilities)
The examples in /usr/share/examples/netgraph show an IP/UDP tunnel.
other combinations are possible.
> Best Regards,
> Gunnar
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Gunnar Olsson Phone: +46 8 5062 5762
> Xelerated Packet Devices AB Fax: +46 8 5455 3211
> Regeringsgatan 67 Mobile: +46 73 3279765
> SE-10386 Stockholm
> Web: http://www.xelerated.com
> Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
--
__--_|\ Julian Elischer
/ \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( OZ ) World tour 2000-2001
---> X_.---._/
v
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
