Greg Lehey([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 05:07:09PM +0930: > One of the reasons this question came up is because dumps weren't > enabled. If they had been, we would have seen the problem. That's > why I'd recommend at least as much swap as memory, even if it doesn't > get touched. when i recall it right, you need size of mem + 1 block for the header, right? /k -- > Nothing is better than Sex. > Masturbation is better than nothing. > Therefore, Masturbation is better than Sex. KR433/KR11-RIPE -- http://www.webmonster.de -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded server Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded server Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded server Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded serve... Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s... Ted Faber
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) load... Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0)... Ted Faber
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (3... Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavil... Greg Lehey
- Re: tuning a VERY heavil... Karsten W. Rohrbach
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0)... David Scheidt
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s... Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) load... Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0)... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0)... Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (3... Paul Herman
- Re: tuning a VERY heavil... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) load... dannyman
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s... Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s... Michael C . Wu