Re: Setting memory allocators for library functions.

[Peter Seebach]

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
>And maybe, just maybe, they'll succeed in getting their
>idea of non-overcommit working with a patch which doesn't
>change dozens of places in the kernel and doesn't add
>any measurable overhead.

If it adds overhead, fine, make it a kernel option.  :)

Anyway, no, I'm not going to contribute code right now.  If I get time
to do this at all, I'll probably do it to UVM first.

My main objection was to the claim that the C standard allows random
segfaults.  It doesn't.  And yes, bad hardware is a conformance violation.  :)

-s

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message